audio-recorder-voice
Guide · formats

MP3 vs WAV

One rule covers almost every case: record WAV if you will edit the file, record MP3 if you will send it. Here is the reasoning, and the exceptions.

What each format is

WAV stores audio as raw numbers — 44,100 or 48,000 measurements per second, each one a 16-bit integer. Nothing is discarded. It is a container for uncompressed data, which is why files are large and why the format has been unchanged since 1991.

MP3 uses a psychoacoustic model to identify parts of the signal a listener is unlikely to perceive, and removes them. The reduction is dramatic — roughly six to one at 128 kbps — and for speech the loss is inaudible. The discarded information cannot be recovered.

Table: WAV, MP3 (128 kbps)
ItemWAVMP3 (128 kbps)
Size per minute5.3 MB0.96 MB
One hour318 MB58 MB
Quality lossNoneSome, generally inaudible for speech
EditingIdealDegrades on re-export
Email attachmentRarely practicalFine
Encoding timeInstantA few seconds per minute
CompatibilityUniversalUniversal

The rule

Why generation loss matters

This is the strongest argument for recording uncompressed. Each MP3 encode discards information permanently. Edit an MP3 and export it again and the second encoder works on already-damaged audio, discarding more. Do it a few times and the degradation becomes clearly audible.

Recording WAV and exporting MP3 once, at the end, means exactly one lossy step no matter how much editing happens in between.

When the difference is actually audible

What about Opus?

Opus is the format your browser produces natively, and it is technically better than MP3 — clearly superior at low bitrates, and free of patents. The reason not to default to it is compatibility: .webm files are rejected by plenty of upload forms and older software. Opus is the right choice for files that stay with you, MP3 for files that travel.

A practical decision

Podcast recording
WAV — you will edit it
Voice note to a friend
MP3 — small and universal
Voiceover for a client
WAV — clients almost always specify it
Lecture recording
MP3 — file size across a term matters
Singing or music
WAV — artefacts are audible on this material
Interview for transcription
MP3 — accuracy is unaffected, size is not

More in guides

See all guides — two kinds of guide: fixing something that is broken, and getting a better result from something that already works.

Questions

Is WAV always better quality than MP3?

Technically yes, since nothing is discarded. Audibly, for speech at 128 kbps, the difference is essentially undetectable. Where WAV genuinely wins is as source material for editing.

Can I convert MP3 back to WAV to restore quality?

No. Converting gives you a large file containing the same degraded audio. The discarded information is gone permanently.

Which is better for transcription?

MP3 is fine. Transcription accuracy depends on clarity, background noise and speaker overlap, not on compression at reasonable bitrates.

Why is my WAV file so large?

Because it is uncompressed — about 5.3 MB per minute of mono audio. That is the format working as intended, not a fault.

What bitrate should an MP3 be?

128 kbps is the standard for spoken word and is what this site produces. Music benefits from 192 or 256 kbps, which is a job for a desktop encoder.

Should I record in Opus instead?

If the file stays with you, Opus is better than MP3 at the same size. If it needs to be accepted by other software or upload forms, MP3 is safer — WebM files are still rejected in plenty of places.